id: opt-ex-thevenin-complete type: multi-part difficulty: hard points: 40 related_lesson: opt-03 question: | COMPLETE THÉVENIN ANALYSIS You measured the following Thévenin parameters for your DRSSTC at 188 kHz: - Z_th = 115 - j2300 Ω (drive OFF, 1V test source) - V_th = 340 kV (drive ON, no load) The spark has: - C_mut = 8 pF, C_sh = 5 pF (from FEMM) - R = 65 kΩ (assumed operating resistance) Tasks: (a) Calculate the spark admittance Y_spark (b) Convert to Z_spark (c) Calculate total circuit impedance Z_total = Z_th + Z_spark (d) Calculate current through the spark (e) Calculate voltage across the spark (f) Calculate real power dissipated in the spark (g) Compare R to R_opt_power for these capacitances hints: - "Use admittance formulas for parallel (R || C_mut) then series with C_sh" - "Add impedances in series: Z_total = Z_th + Z_spark" - "Current divider applies: I = V_th / Z_total" - "Voltage across spark: V_spark = I × Z_spark" - "Power: P = 0.5 × |I|² × Re{Z_spark}" solution: steps: - "Part (a): Calculate Y_spark" - "ω = 2π × 188×10³ = 1.181×10⁶ rad/s" - "G = 1/65000 = 15.38 μS" - "B₁ = 1.181×10⁶ × 8×10⁻¹² = 9.45 μS" - "B₂ = 1.181×10⁶ × 5×10⁻¹² = 5.91 μS" - "Denom: G² + (B₁+B₂)² = 236.5 + 236.2 = 472.7 μS²" - "Re{Y} = 15.38 × 34.93 / 472.7 = 1.14 μS" - "Im{Y} = 5.91 × [236.5 + 145.2] / 472.7 = 4.77 μS" - "Y_spark = 1.14 + j4.77 μS" - "Part (b): Convert to Z_spark" - "|Y| = √(1.14² + 4.77²) = 4.90 μS" - "|Z_spark| = 1/4.90×10⁻⁶ = 204 kΩ" - "φ_Y = atan(4.77/1.14) = 76.6°" - "φ_Z = -76.6°" - "R_eq = 204 × cos(-76.6°) = 47.6 kΩ" - "X_eq = 204 × sin(-76.6°) = -198 kΩ" - "Z_spark = 47.6 - j198 kΩ" - "Part (c): Calculate Z_total" - "Z_total = Z_th + Z_spark" - "= (115 - j2300) + (47600 - j198000)" - "= (47715 - j200300) Ω" - "= 47.7 - j200.3 kΩ" - "|Z_total| = √(47.7² + 200.3²) = 205.9 kΩ" - "Part (d): Calculate current" - "I = V_th / Z_total = 340×10³ / 205.9×10³ = 1.65 A peak" - "Part (e): Calculate voltage across spark" - "V_spark = I × Z_spark = 1.65 × 204×10³ = 337 kV" - "Part (f): Calculate power" - "P = 0.5 × I² × R_eq = 0.5 × 1.65² × 47.6×10³" - "= 0.5 × 2.72 × 47.6×10³ = 64.8 kW" - "Part (g): Compare to R_opt_power" - "R_opt = 1/(ω × (C_mut + C_sh))" - "= 1/(1.181×10⁶ × 13×10⁻¹²) = 65.1 kΩ" - "Actual R = 65 kΩ ≈ R_opt_power ✓" - "Operating at optimal resistance for maximum power transfer!" answer_a: "1.14 + j4.77 μS" answer_b: "204 kΩ ∠-76.6° or 47.6 - j198 kΩ" answer_c: "205.9 kΩ" answer_d: "1.65" unit_d: "A peak" answer_e: "337" unit_e: "kV" answer_f: "64.8" unit_f: "kW" answer_g: "R_opt = 65.1 kΩ, actual = 65 kΩ, at optimum!" tolerance: 3.0 explanation: | This complete Thévenin analysis demonstrates the power of the equivalent circuit method. Key insights: (1) Most voltage appears across the spark (337 kV out of 340 kV) because |Z_spark| >> |Z_th|, (2) The actual R ≈ R_opt_power suggests the plasma self-optimized to maximize power extraction, (3) Power dissipated (64.8 kW) is substantial, (4) Strongly capacitive spark (φ_Z = -76.6°) is typical. This analysis predicts performance without full coupled simulation. related_concepts: ["thevenin-method", "complete-analysis", "power-prediction", "self-optimization"]